KyPost To Go: RSS | Email Alerts | -
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large

Ten Commandments Back In Court


Last Update: 8/08/2008 12:10 pm
Anna Dollar of Boone, NC, and Deanna Gosnell of Avery, N.C., hold posters during a rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2005 to support the Ten Commandments as the court heard two cases on whether Ten Commandments monuments should be displayed on government property. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Anna Dollar of Boone, NC, and Deanna Gosnell of Avery, N.C., hold posters during a rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2005 to support the Ten Commandments as the court heard two cases on whether Ten Commandments monuments should be displayed on government property. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) - A federal judge will allow attorneys for two Kentucky counties to argue their motives have changed for posting the Ten Commandments.

U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer B. Coffman on Monday made permanent an injunction barring McCreary and Pukaski counties from posting documents containing the commandments.

The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2005 upheld the injunction, citing county officials statements of religious motivation.

However, the divided court left open the possibility that the counties could someday post the commandments if they could demonstrate secular motives.

Coffman is allowing the counties to argue that resolutions passed in October 2007 have "purged the taint" of past efforts to promote religion, which is unconstitutional.

Officials in both counties approved similar resolutions in 2007 noting that the makeup of both fiscal courts had changed almost entirely.

The resolutions also declared the displays would educate people "on some of the documents and symbols that played an important role in the foundation, development and history" of the counties, state and nation.

Each county also "expressly disclaims any purpose to endorse religion in its desire to display the Foundations of American Law and Government display and expressly repeals, repudiates and disavows any public statements or testimony that may be mistakenly construed to the contrary," the resolutions say.

The ACLU of Kentucky plans to respond, attorney William Sharp said.

"Given the history of this case and the resolutions that came before, one would certainly have to be at least cautious in accepting any such statement of purpose by the counties," he said.

Attorney Mathew Staver of the Liberty Counsel, which represents both counties, said officials have made it clear that their motivations are now secular.

"We're not repudiating the fact that the Ten Commandments have a religious aspect," he said. "But the primary purpose of putting them up would not be religious. This is not an expression of religious doctrine. This is an expression of heritage that happens to include religious as well as other heritages."

©2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

News from the (859)
Tri-State news from WCPO.com
News from the Commonwealth
National News
KY Sports and Scores
  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.